Consider Peer Feedback

Review by: Yonathan Gal-Perez, Payce Grossman, Benny Lazarson

 

Comments: Elements look good. Videos and product presentation is good, but the commercial is unpresentable and not interesting.

 

Iterations Considered: We redid our commercial, making it more visually appealing and adding a clear video of our prototype to add engagement.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Review by: Alberto Dichi, Trevor Hull, Aaron Rubinoff

 

Comments: All the information is fine, but its better to embed the actual financial chart onto the website instead of putting a download button as well as a link to view their survey. The idea is really interesting and has the potential to make a lot of money.

 

Iterations Considered: We embedded all of our pdfs into the website so viewers wouldnt have to go to a new tab and use a link.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Review by: Alan Kreisberger, Daniel Arazi, Eden Ezra

 

Comments: Its not good that people need to click on the links to the pdf files to see survey results. Need to make a nicer looking goals and constraints page.

 

Iteration Considered: We changed our goals and constraints into a slicker and simpler design. We embedded all of our pdfs into the website so viewers wouldnt have to go to a new tab and use a link.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Review by: Jacob Sossin, Josh Koplowitz, Aaron Feldbaum

 

Comments: Blue Motion demonstrates strong engineering complexity, with a solid prototype and clear technical documentation. However, the background and market research sections

could be more thorough, with additional details on target users and market trends. The

empathy section lacks depth, and the project’s definition could be clearer. The prototype

is well-executed, though including user testing results would improve it. Engineering

documentation is solid but could benefit from clearer organization. Testing and reflection

are effective but could use measurable outcomes to provide more insight. The digital

portfolio is visually appealing, with minor improvements needed

 

Iteration Considered: Fixed the details on target users and the market, created more thoroughness in the empathy section. Added user testing results, Organized Engineering Documentation, fixed test and reflect

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Review by: Yehuda Shitrit, Ethan Brown

 

Comments: Engineering Drawings are very poorly organized, not clear where the presentation is, no commercial and the prototype is not documented well

 

Iteration Considered: Prototype documentation updated, Engineering Drawings organized, commercial and presentation were put on the website